Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “‘[cjourts often take a dim view of issues raised for the first time in post-judgment motions’” (citation omitted)
• observing that courts have considered new evidence, new arguments, and “even newly submitted cases” under Rule 54, even though local rules similar to LRQ 7.3 may not have technically permitted it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).