Bostic v. AT & T of the Virgin Islands

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting there were unsettled issues of law and that it would be preferable for the state courts to address them in the first instance
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, noting inter alia that “[a]t a trial on the merits, the vast majority of evidence in this case would pertain solely to the [state] claims”
• “In determining whether the state issues substantially predominate, courts consider primarily the ‘proof,’ the ‘scope of the issues raised,’ and the ‘comprehensiveness of the remedy sought.’” (quoting Gibbs, 383 U.S. at 726)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).