Skip to main content
· 2/9/1961

Bossons v. Lovebright Diamond Co.

Citations

  • 126 So. 2d 919
  • 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 3423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims involving the application of the deadly weapon enhancement are claims challenging the discretionary aspects of a sentence
  • holding that the totality of the circumstances proved the defendant was aware of, and constructively possessed, the firearm that was discovered in the home
  • balding that \[ilt is undisputed that a gun can be an instrument of crime\
  • upholding 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712, but opining that the statute would fail if Harris and McMillan were overturned
  • upholding 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712, but opining that the statute would fail if Harris and McMillan were overturned
  • upholding 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712, but opining that the statute would fail if Harris and McMillan were overturned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.