· 4/22/1985
Bossingham v. Bloomington Production Credit Ass'n (In Re Bossingham)
Citations
- 49 B.R. 345
- 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1766
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- financing statement not sufficient to create a security interest in the absence of language which objectively indicates such an intent
- financing statement not sufficient to create a security interest in the absence of language which objectively indicates such an intent
- financing statement and handwritten agreement, when read together, satisfy the objective test with respect to showing an intention of the parties to create a security interest
- financing statement and handwritten agreement, when read together, satisfy the objective test with respect to showing an intention of the parties to create a security interest
- standard financing statement could not serve as security agreement in absence of language granting security interest
- “specific 'words of grant’ are not required”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donald E. O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.