Skip to main content
· 4/22/1985

Bossingham v. Bloomington Production Credit Ass'n (In Re Bossingham)

Citations

  • 49 B.R. 345
  • 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1766
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • financing statement not sufficient to create a security interest in the absence of language which objectively indicates such an intent
  • financing statement not sufficient to create a security interest in the absence of language which objectively indicates such an intent
  • financing statement and handwritten agreement, when read together, satisfy the objective test with respect to showing an intention of the parties to create a security interest
  • financing statement and handwritten agreement, when read together, satisfy the objective test with respect to showing an intention of the parties to create a security interest
  • standard financing statement could not serve as security agreement in absence of language granting security interest
  • “specific 'words of grant’ are not required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donald E. O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.