Bosque v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs stated breach of contract claim under Rule 12(b)(6
• noting that “plaintiffs need not plead specific damages flowing from a breach of contract in their complaint”
• noting that “promissory estoppel is usually asserted as an alternative theory of recovery for a contract that is not supported by consideration”
• denying motion to dismiss promissory estoppel claim where pled as an alternative theory of recovery
• denying motion to dismiss Chapter 93A claim arising out of HAMP application
• deceptive 30 representations about eligibility for HAMP sufficient to state claim under Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).