· 11/9/2005
Bosley v. Singleton
Citations
- 237 F.R.D. 401
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27120
- 2005 WL 4723887
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying conditional collective certification where plaintiffs \offered no admissible evidence\ to support contentions made in complaint
- denying conditional collective certification where plaintiffs \offered no admissible evidence\ to support contention made in complaint
- denying conditional certification where plaintiffs “offered no admissible evidence” to support contentions made in the complaint
- noting evidence that some managers flouted policy by falsely reducing hours or requiring off-the-clock work was not sufficient because “plaintiffs have not shown that such activity was widespread or common practice”
- noting evidence that some managers flouted policy by falsely reducing hours or requiring off-the-clock work was not sufficient because “plaintiffs have not shown that such activity was widespread or common practice”
- practice of 11 allocating payroll hours to each store
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spiegel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.