Skip to main content
· 11/9/2005

Bosley v. Singleton

Citations

  • 237 F.R.D. 401
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27120
  • 2005 WL 4723887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying conditional collective certification where plaintiffs \offered no admissible evidence\ to support contentions made in complaint
  • denying conditional collective certification where plaintiffs \offered no admissible evidence\ to support contention made in complaint
  • denying conditional certification where plaintiffs “offered no admissible evidence” to support contentions made in the complaint
  • noting evidence that some managers flouted policy by falsely reducing hours or requiring off-the-clock work was not sufficient because “plaintiffs have not shown that such activity was widespread or common practice”
  • noting evidence that some managers flouted policy by falsely reducing hours or requiring off-the-clock work was not sufficient because “plaintiffs have not shown that such activity was widespread or common practice”
  • practice of 11 allocating payroll hours to each store

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spiegel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.