Bosky v. Kroger Texas, LP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the information supporting removal must be unequivocally clear and certain to commence the time clock for removal
• holding that “the information supporting removal in a copy of an amended pleading ... must be unequivocally clear and certain to start the time limit running for a notice of removal” (internal quotation omitted)
• holding that “the information supporting removal in a copy of an amended pleading, motion, order or other paper must be ‘unequivocally clear and certain’ to start the time limit running for a notice of removal under the second paragraph of section 1446(b).” (emphasis added)
• holding that “the information supporting removal in a copy of an amended pleading, motion, order or other paper must be ‘unequivocally clear and certain’ to start the time limit running for a notice of removal under the second paragraph of section 1446(b).” (emphasis added)
• providing that the removal window is triggered only when it is “unequivocally clear and certain” that federal jurisdiction exists
• stating that it is “improper for a party to first remove and only then seek to develop facts showing that federal subject matter jurisdiction exists”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).