Washington Supreme Court· 5/1/1969
Bosko v. Pitts & Still, Inc.
Citations
- 454 P.2d 229
- 75 Wash. 2d 856
- 1969 Wash. LEXIS 808
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- automobile exclusion did not apply where dump truck transported improperly stabilized waste material to site
- insurer was estopped 14 from asserting a new ground for avoiding liability because insurer waited until “after the 15 commencement of [lawsuit]” and nearly three years after the incident that gave rise to coverage
- “The presence of the waste material on Milwaukee’s right-of-way was clearly a trespass, conceded to have been caused by Bosko’s negligence in failing ‘to put in a retaining wall or other factor to shore up and hold said 50 truckloads of waste material.’ ”
- estoppel availability limited to circumstances where prejudice shown
- estoppel availability limited to circumstances where prejudice shown
- traditional equitable estoppel requires prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 2000-06-15· cited 164×
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2000-06-15· cited 145×
- Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-08· cited 106×
- Gruol Construction Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-07-15· cited 80×
- Viani v. Aetna Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court· 1972-10-06· cited 63×
- New Hampshire Insurance Company v. ChristySupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-09-19· cited 43×
- Weaver v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-04-17· cited 43×
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1995-04-14· cited 40×
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1995-08-01· cited 29×
- D.E.M. v. AllicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 29×
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. M&S Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-27· cited 27×
- Karpenski v. American General Life Companies, LLCW.D. Washington· 2014-04-02· cited 23×
- Rizzuti v. Basin Travel Service of Othello, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-03· cited 19×
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-04-11· cited 17×
- Vandivort Construction Co. v. Seattle Tennis ClubCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-05-20· cited 16×
- James E. Torina Fine Homes, Inc. v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-14· cited 15×
- Dykstra v. DykstraIdaho Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 14×
- Onyon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeW.D. Washington· 1994-08-09· cited 14×
- Wolfe v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-07-29· cited 13×
- Alleyne v. Diageo USVI, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2015-09-17· cited 11×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1957-06-20· cited 53×
- Evans v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1952-06-12· cited 44×
- Lawrence v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1957-05-16· cited 43×
- Labberton v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court· 1958-11-28· cited 30×
- Deer Trail Consolidated Mining Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1904-10-05· cited 23×
- Fecht v. MakowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-02-26· cited 15×
- Lancon v. Employers National Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1968-02-01· cited 14×
- D'Aquilla Bros. Contracting Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court· 1959-10-06· cited 12×
- Moore v. National Accident SocietyWashington Supreme Court· 1905-03-30· cited 10×
- Union Insurance Exchange, Inc. v. GaulSeventh Circuit· 1968-03-21· cited 10×
- Kong Yick Investment Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1967-02-16· cited 6×
- D'Aquilla Bros. Contracting Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1961-12-11· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.