Bosko v. Pitts & Still, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• automobile exclusion did not apply where dump truck transported improperly stabilized waste material to site
• insurer was estopped 14 from asserting a new ground for avoiding liability because insurer waited until “after the 15 commencement of [lawsuit]” and nearly three years after the incident that gave rise to coverage
• “The presence of the waste material on Milwaukee’s right-of-way was clearly a trespass, conceded to have been caused by Bosko’s negligence in failing ‘to put in a retaining wall or other factor to shore up and hold said 50 truckloads of waste material.’ ”
• estoppel availability limited to circumstances where prejudice shown
• estoppel availability limited to circumstances where prejudice shown
• traditional equitable estoppel requires prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).