Skip to main content
· 12/19/1989

Bosak v. McDonough

Citations

  • 549 N.E.2d 643
  • 192 Ill. App. 3d 799
  • 139 Ill. Dec. 917
  • 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 1904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing conspiracy claim against attorney but finding insufficient evidence to impose liability
  • recognizing conspiracy claim against attorney but finding insufficient evidence to impose liability
  • recognizing conspiracy claim against attorney but finding insufficient evidence to impose liability
  • attorney who advised realtor to cover shortage in his escrow account, but did not agree to perpetrate fraud against investor, could not be held liable for civil conspiracy
  • summary judgment for defendant was proper where the undisputed facts, and the disputed facts read in the light most favorable to plaintiff, did not provide clear and convincing evidence of the existence of a fiduciary relationship
  • “The elements of a cause of action for conspiracy to defraud are: (1) a conspiracy; (2) an overt act of fraud in furtherance of the conspiracy; and (3) damages to the plaintiff as a result of the fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DiVITO

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.