Borta v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant cannot be convicted of both murder and felony murder
• rejecting defendant’s claim that any exculpatory hearsay evidence is constitutionally required to be admitted, regardless of its admissibility under evidentiary mies
• rejecting constitutional challenge to instruction that reasonable doubt is doubt “for which you can in your own mind conscientiously give a reason” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• rejecting constitutional challenge to instruction that reasonable doubt is doubt “for which you can in your own mind conscientiously give a reason” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• third party's statements to informant, recounted in informant's statement to police, constitute multiple levels of hearsay
• third party’s statements to informant, recounted in informant’s statement to police, constitute multiple levels of hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).