Borschow Hospital & Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Cesar Castillo Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff failed to adduce evidence that it was injured by defendant’s alleged anticompetitive acts
• explaining that “extrinsic evidence of the parties’ intent is inadmissible in the face of a clear and unambiguous contract terms under Puerto Rico Law.”
• noting that courts have interpreted article 1233 “to be ’strict in its mandate that courts should enforce the literal sense of a written contract, unless the words are somehow contrary to the intent of the parties”
• holding nonexclusivity provision in dealership agreement dispositive of Dealer Act claim
• affirming a district court grant of summary judgment against a tying plaintiff where the defendant threatened to withhold a product, but did not act on the threat
• affirming a district court grant of summary judgment against a tying plaintiff where the defendant threatened to withhold a product, but did not act on the threat

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).