Borovsky v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Board should not have applied Eighth Circuit law when venue was proper in Seventh Circuit
• concluding that Board should not have applied Eighth Circuit law when venue was proper in Seventh Circuit
• holding that a court will “reverse only if the record ‘compels’ a contrary result”
• concluding that unspecified threats did not compel finding of past persecution
• concluding that unspecified threats did not compel finding of past persecution
• remand is unnecessary when it would lead to a finding of harmless- ness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).