Borovich v. Colt Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “appellant properly asserted the va-cua in the original findings of the Referee, which would justify an ultimate finding that the emphysema was not causally connected to the employment under the provisions of section 108(n).” (Emphasis added.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).