Borough of Moosic v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that HRS § 46-4(a)’s “statutory protection of lawfully existing uses . . . ‘is grounded in [state and federal] constitutional law’”
• construing a new county zoning ordinance in accordance with HRS § 46-4(a) to protect prior lawful operators of short-term rentals as nonconforming uses
• “The statutory protection of lawfully existing uses and structures prior to the effective date of a zoning restriction is grounded in constitutional law.”
• “[t]he statutory protection of lawfully existing uses and structures prior to the effective date of a zoning restriction is grounded in constitutional law.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).