Skip to main content
· 7/16/1990

Borough of Lavallette v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection & Cibageigy Corp.

Citations

  • 576 A.2d 784
  • 120 N.J. 164
  • 1990 N.J. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that agency failed to make antidegradation findings necessary to issue NPDES renewal permit
  • stating that fact finding is a basic requirement and when it is not done, the usual remedy is a remand
  • stating that “[wjhen an agency’s decision is not accompanied by the necessary findings of fact, the usual remedy is to remand the matter to the agency to correct the deficiency”
  • \The findings should be adequately supported by the record and carefully explained.\
  • “The findings should be adequately supported by the record and carefully explained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.