BOROUGH OF FRANKLIN VS. JEFFREY R. SMITH (L-0566-19, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, in arrest-warrant case, that “[u]nder Hudson, it is clear that the exclusionary rule does not apply to Fourth Amendment knock- and-announce violations”
• declining to recede from Benefield v. State, 160 So 2d 706 (Fla. 1964), which applied the exclusionary rule to violations of a statutory knock-and-announce requirement
• reaffirming suppression as remedy for violation of parallel knock-and-an-nounee provision of § 901.19(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).