Borough of Ellwood City v. Pennsylvania Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “intrastate sales are subject to the Robinson-Patman Act as long as the sales remain in the flow of interstate commerce”
• determining that electricity is “commodity” under ■ antitrust laws
• “The mere fact that Penn Power and its parent corporation share some common directors *** is not sufficient evidence to show the necessary concerted action.”
• “The mere fact that Penn Power and its parent corporation share some common directors *** is not sufficient evidence to show the necessary concerted action. *** Plaintiffs’ argument is akin to the argument that mere active membership in a trade association constitutes an agreement.”
• \The mere fact that Penn Power and its parent corporation share some common directors * * * is not sufficient evidence to show the necessary concerted action. * * * Plaintiffs' argument is akin to the argument that mere active membership in a trade association constitutes an agreement.\
• when ruling on a second motion for summary judgment by the Defendant and a motion for leave to amend the complaint by Plaintiff, the Court incorporated by reference its prior opinion addressing a motion to dismiss which it had treated in part as a motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).