Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for hearing because findings relative to fee award failed to comport with Pitrolo
• “the fee-shifting statute at issue contemplates that the fee award belongs to the successful complainant.”
• “the fee-shifting statute at issue contemplates that the fee award belongs to the successful complainant.”
• “The calculation of attorney’s fees in a human rights action requires, as this Court has previously recognized, the exclusion of hours spent on unsuccessful claims.”
• “The calculation of attorney’s fees in a human rights action requires, as this Court has previously recognized, the exclusion of hours spent on unsuccessful claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).