Skip to main content
· 1/27/2010

Boroff v. Alza Corp.

Citations

  • 685 F. Supp. 2d 704
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6654
  • 2010 WL 395211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding plaintiff’s manufacturing defect claim inadequately pleaded when the complaint was bereft of any factual allegation that the product failed to conform with any design specification, formula, or performance standard
  • dismissing manufacturing defect claim where the complaint was “bereft of any allegation that [the product used by plaintiff] deviated from any design specifications, formula, or performance standards”
  • “But there would appear to be little benefit to forcing a plaintiff, as a matter of pleading, to assert legal conclusions corresponding to the elements of the complicated multi-factor balancing test set forth in R.C. § 2307.75.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.