Boro Park Land Co., LLC v. Princeton Excess Surplus Lines Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting forth deposition testimony as purported material facts does not satisfy Rule 74.04;' such is not a statement of material facts, and doing so simply forced the opponent into a “useless exercise” of denying or admitting that the deposition was quoted accurately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).