Skip to main content
· 11/25/2003

Borneman v. Principal Life Insurance

Citations

  • 291 F. Supp. 2d 935
  • 31 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2190
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21453
  • 2003 WL 22794312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n individual claiming retaliation must show that he engaged in activity that was protected by either his employee benefit plan or ERISA itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.