· 11/25/2003
Borneman v. Principal Life Insurance
Citations
- 291 F. Supp. 2d 935
- 31 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2190
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21453
- 2003 WL 22794312
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]n individual claiming retaliation must show that he engaged in activity that was protected by either his employee benefit plan or ERISA itself.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pratt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.