Skip to main content
· 9/23/1998

Bormann v. KOSSUTH COUNTY BD. OF SUP'RS

Citations

  • 584 N.W.2d 309
  • 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20235
  • 1998 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 214
  • 1998 WL 650904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that first step in takings analysis is whether “a constitutionally protected private property interest [is] at stake”
  • holding statutory nuisance immunity for farm operation created \an easement in the property affected by the nuisance\ in favor of the operator, and constituted a taking
  • holding statutory nuisance immunity for farm operation created “an easement in the property affected by the nuisance” in favor of the operator, and constituted a taking
  • distinguishing between “nuisance” and “trespass” on the basis of the nature of the invasion of the property
  • noting difference between physical invasion and regulation of use of property
  • “Negligence may or may not accompany a nuisance; negligence, however, is not an essential element of nuisance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andreasen, Larson, Lavorato

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.