Borja v. Beard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an extension of the appeal deadline when appellant “did not file a motion under Rule 58(e)” within the default appeal period
• notice of appeal that is timely only as to attorney’s fee order does not allow appellate review of underlying judgment
• “Plaintiff’s assumption that [d]efendants would not meet and confer in good faith . . . is not an excuse for failure to comply” with meet and confer requirements
• motion for attorney’s fees does not extend the time to appeal from the final judgment unless the district court so orders under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(e); attorney’s fees motions cannot be recharacterized as Rule 59 motions to extend the time to appeal an underlying judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).