Boris Khazin v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank and finding Sarbanes-Oxley has exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement while Dodd-Frank has no such requirement
• “The Anti- Arbitration Provision [of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act] is expressly limited to a single category of disputes: those ‘arising under this section,’ meaning Section 1514A of the United States Code.”
• ʺThe fact that Congress did not append an anti‐arbitration provision to the Dodd‐Frank cause of action while contemporaneously adding such provisions elsewhere suggests . . . that the omission was deliberate.ʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).