Skip to main content
· 5/6/1972

Boring v. Haynes

Citations

  • 496 P.2d 1385
  • 209 Kan. 413
  • 1972 Kan. LEXIS 588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing summary judgment in an AD & D dispute as an “extreme remedy”
  • discussing the general rules applied in Rankin
  • approving Gilliland’s definition of “accident”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.