· 5/6/1972
Boring v. Haynes
Citations
- 496 P.2d 1385
- 209 Kan. 413
- 1972 Kan. LEXIS 588
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing summary judgment in an AD & D dispute as an “extreme remedy”
- discussing the general rules applied in Rankin
- approving Gilliland’s definition of “accident”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.