· 3/3/1992
Boreham v. Hartsell
Citations
- 826 S.W.2d 193
- 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 1004
- 1992 WL 81135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Mahon broadened statute and failed to properly determine whether statute had been strictly complied with
- concluding that Mahon broadened statute and failed to properly determine whether statute had been strictly complied with
- concluding that Mahon broadened statute and failed to properly determine if strictly complied with statute
- concluding that plaintiff failed to strictly comply with requirements of long-arm statute when he failed to specify that address given was defendant's home office
- concluding that plaintiff failed to strictly comply with requirements of long-arm statute when he failed to specify that address given was defendant’s home office
- “In our view, the Ma-hon court gave only lip service to [the strict-compliance standard] and incorrectly broadened the [long-arm] statute. We decline to follow Mahon.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Thomas, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.