Skip to main content
· 3/3/1992

Boreham v. Hartsell

Citations

  • 826 S.W.2d 193
  • 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 1004
  • 1992 WL 81135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Mahon broadened statute and failed to properly determine whether statute had been strictly complied with
  • concluding that Mahon broadened statute and failed to properly determine whether statute had been strictly complied with
  • concluding that Mahon broadened statute and failed to properly determine if strictly complied with statute
  • concluding that plaintiff failed to strictly comply with requirements of long-arm statute when he failed to specify that address given was defendant's home office
  • concluding that plaintiff failed to strictly comply with requirements of long-arm statute when he failed to specify that address given was defendant’s home office
  • “In our view, the Ma-hon court gave only lip service to [the strict-compliance standard] and incorrectly broadened the [long-arm] statute. We decline to follow Mahon.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Thomas, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.