Boreham v. Byrne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant did not establish a prima facie case based on the State’s use of four of its nine allotted peremptory strikes against black potential jurors
• noting that, while “the prosecutor’s questions and statements during voir dire examination and in exercising his challenges may support or refute an inference of discriminatory purpose[,]” no transcript of the voir dire or jury selection appeared in the record
• criminal intent is a question for the factfinder, and can be inferred from the defendant’s conduct before, during, and after the commission of the crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).