Borders v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In a homicide prosecution a defendant should be permitted the widest of latitude when introducing evidence in support of a self-defense theory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hennum
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-06-16· cited 83×
• Bechtel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1992-09-02· cited 65×
• State v. Hickson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-21· cited 42×
• Lindabury v. Lindabury
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-19· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Dillon
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-31· cited 25×
• Terry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-10· cited 23×
• Hawthorne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-07· cited 17×
• Pueblo v. González Román
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1992-02-04· cited 16×
• McDaniel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-21· cited 13×
• Poole v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-26· cited 11×
• Warren v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-04· cited 6×
• Rogers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-08· cited 6×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-25· cited 1×
• Porter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hawthorne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-18· cited 65×
• Cole v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-12-08· cited 15×
• Martinez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-06-06· cited 15×
• Pierce v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-23· cited 11×
• Campos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-19· cited 8×