Skip to main content
· 8/30/1993

Borden, Inc. v. Spoor Behrins Campbell & Young, Inc.

Citations

  • 828 F. Supp. 216
  • 1993 WL 287404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fact finder could conclude that conspiracy existed where defendant took steps to conceal co-conspirator’s fraud
  • “plaintiffs need not show that each conspirator agreed to every detail of the conspiracy but only that each agreed on the ‘essential nature of the plan.’ ”
  • Copperweld doesn’t apply to non- 14 antitrust conspiracies under federal or New York law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William C. Conner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.