Borden, Inc. v. Price

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the traffic regulation allowed the act if it could be done safely, the prohibition was conditional and not the basis for negligence per se
• holding that because the traffic regulation allowed the act if it could be done safely, the prohibition was conditional and not the basis for negligence per se
• holding that because the traffic regulation allowed the act if it could be done safely, the prohibition was conditional and not the basis for negligence per se
• holding that because the traffic regulation allowed the act if it could be done safely, the prohibition was conditional and not the basis for negligence per se
• explaining that a jury verdict form may explain the effect of finding a plaintiff “50% or less” negligent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).