Borden, Inc. v. Meiji Milk Products Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jurisdiction over preliminary injunction in aid of covered arbitration was proper because the remedy sought did not try to \bypass arbitration\
• holding that jurisdiction over preliminary injunction in aid of covered arbitration was proper because the remedy sought did not try to \bypass arbitration\
• holding that jurisdiction over preliminary injunction in aid of covered arbitration was proper because the remedy sought did not try to “bypass arbitration”
• holding that jurisdiction over preliminary injunction in aid of covered arbitration was proper because the remedy sought did not try to “bypass arbitration”
• stating that “unavailability of beneficial litigation procedures similar to those available in the federal district courts does not render an alternative forum inadequate”
• stating that \unavailability of beneficial litigation procedures similar to those available in the federal district courts does not render an alternative forum inadequate\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).