Borcyk v. Lempke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]enials [under C.P.L. § 440.10(3)(c)] are discretionary and do not impose an absolute bar on successive motions.” (quoting Bonilla v. Portuondo, No. 00Civ.2369(JGK)(JCF), 2004 WL 350694, at (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 2004) (citations omitted)
• “[D]enials [under C.P.L. § 440.10(3)(c)] are discretionary and do not impose an absolute bar on successive motions.” (quoting Bonilla v. Portuondo, No. 00CIV.2369(JGK)9JCF), 2004 WL 350694, at (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 2004), adopted, No. 00 CIV. 2369 (JGK

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).