Borbely v. Prestole Everlock, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In our view, simply because a person is capable of having a fixed purpose to commit suicide does not necessarily mean that the resulting suicide is voluntary.”
• “In our view, simply because a person is capable of having a fixed purpose to commit suicide does not necessarily mean that the resulting suicide is voluntary.”
• finding chain of causation test “more logical and enlightened”
• finding chain of causation test “more logical and enlightened”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Conley-Slowinski v. Superior Spinning & Stamping Co.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 1998-06-19· cited 114×
• Rodriguez v. Henkle Drilling & Supply Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1992-04-03· cited 7×
• Walsh v. Tehachapi Unified School District
  E.D. California· 2014-02-04· cited 6×
• William Kealoha v. Owcp
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-04-09· cited 3×
• Parker v. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-12-28
• Appeal of Pelmac Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2021-10-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sponatski's Case
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1915-03-31· cited 170×
• Burnight v. Industrial Accident Commission
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-06-17· cited 34×
• McCoy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-11· cited 28×
• Globe Security Systems Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-28· cited 23×
• Lupfer v. Baldwin Locomotive Works
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1921-02-14· cited 13×
• Hammons v. City of Highland Park Police Department
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1985-01-29· cited 12×
• Burnett v. Industrial Commission
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 1949-11-01· cited 2×