· 2/22/1994
Borbas v. Virginia Employment Commission
Citations
- 17 Va. App. 720
- 440 S.E.2d 630
- 10 Va. Law Rep. 926
- 1994 Va. App. LEXIS 89
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding defendant-spouse without standing to contest a district court’s decision to compel the spouse to testify
- remanding for “specific, individualized findings regarding the quantity of drugs each appellant might have reasonably foreseen his or her agreed upon participation would involve”
- in the context of uncertainty about whether the district court’s application of the erroneous standard had been prejudicial
- in the context of uncertainty about whether the district court's application of the erroneous standard had been prejudicial
- no risk of prejudice with ten charged defendants
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.