Skip to main content
· 2/22/1994

Borbas v. Virginia Employment Commission

Citations

  • 17 Va. App. 720
  • 440 S.E.2d 630
  • 10 Va. Law Rep. 926
  • 1994 Va. App. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding defendant-spouse without standing to contest a district court’s decision to compel the spouse to testify
  • remanding for “specific, individualized findings regarding the quantity of drugs each appellant might have reasonably foreseen his or her agreed upon participation would involve”
  • in the context of uncertainty about whether the district court’s application of the erroneous standard had been prejudicial
  • in the context of uncertainty about whether the district court's application of the erroneous standard had been prejudicial
  • no risk of prejudice with ten charged defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.