Borawski v. Henderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over a federal employee’s defamation claim against the United States
• “Retaliatory action under CEPA is confined to completed . . . personnel actions that have an effect on either compensation or job rank” (internal quotation omitted)
• “[T]he district court should only permit discovery or conduct an evidentiary hearing where there is a ‘genuine issue of fact material to the scope of employment question.’”
• “[T]he district court should only permit discovery or conduct an evidentiary hearing where there is a ‘genuine issue of fact material to the scope of employment question.’ ” (quoting Schrob, 967 F.2d at 936)
• applying intentional tort exception to claims against the Postmaster General

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).