Bora Machine & Die Works, Inc. v. Clark Lift of New York, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to consider video evidence because the district court found that the video itself created a genuine factual dispute
• dismissing interlocutory appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction and remanding for further proceedings
• dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction where the appellant “giv[es] lip service to the correct legal standard” but instead “assumes fact different from those assumed” below (quoting Reyes v. City of Richmond, 287 F.3d 346, 350 (5th Cir. 2002)
• “Our precedent in Lytle v. Bexar County holds that the use of deadly force against a fleeing suspect who poses insufficient harm to others violates clearly established law.”
• describing the qualified immunity analysis as “fact-intensive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).