Boothe v. Summit Coal Mining Co.
Citations
- 72 Wash. 679
- 131 P. 252
- 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1538
Syllabus
<p>Corporations — Actions by Stockholders — For Benefit of Corporation. In an action by a stockholder on bebalf of htimself and others similarly situated, in which there is a favorable termination, the benefit of which goes to the corporation, plaintiff is entitled to recover a reasonable attorney’s fee and necessary disbursements, but such allowance will not be made to a stockholder owning half of the stock, in a controversy with the owner of the other half, in which a receiver was appointed on the theory of a partnership, and no one but the plaintiff was benefited by the result of the suit.</p> <p>Appeal — Decision—“Law of the Case.” Where the supreme court has decided, upon disputed evidence, the right of an officer of a corporation to draw a salary, the decision is the law of the case governing a retrial upon substantially the same evidence.</p> <p>Partnership — Compensation of Partners. A partner cannot claim compensation from the partnership in the absence of an agreement therefor, even if he renders exceptional services; especially where an agreement had been made whereby each was to draw a like amount each month.</p>
Judges: Chadwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Perrault v. Emporium Department Store Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1915-01-16· cited 21×
- In re the Estate of LevyWashington Supreme Court· 1923-05-25· cited 20×
- Joyce v. CongdonWashington Supreme Court· 1921-01-21· cited 13×
- Leppaluoto v. EgglestonWashington Supreme Court· 1960-12-15· cited 12×
- Riddell v. Cascade Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1960-09-01· cited 3×
- Duley v. DuleyWashington Supreme Court· 1924-05-13· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court· 1882-05-18· cited 1,026×
- Boothe v. Summit Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1909-10-04· cited 32×
- Baker v. Seattle-Tacoma Power Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1911-01-07· cited 31×
- Faulkner v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-05-25· cited 16×
- City of Seattle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1911-04-14· cited 9×
- Whipple v. LeeWashington Supreme Court· 1907-04-15· cited 5×
- Boothe v. Summit Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1910-08-18· cited 5×
- Boothe v. Summit Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1911-06-23· cited 3×
- McMillan v. Northport Smelting & Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1908-03-27· cited 2×
- Patrick v. PatrickNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1906-05-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.