Boothe v. Barron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that movement of suspect’s hands along the dashboard of his vehicle was not “sufficiently remarkable to justify search”
• “the facts of this case do not establish that the tinting was a meaningful factor justifying [the officer’s] decision not only to open the door, but to cross the plane of the van and conduct a Terry search of the vehicle’s interior” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).