Booth v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining appellate court is not authorized to consider documents attached to an appellate brief which are not part of the record
• observing that “the office of amicus curiae is to aid the court and it cannot be subverted to the use of a litigant in the case” and that a brief challenging the validity of record testimony is not a proper function of an amicus curiae
• appellate court is not authorized to consider documents attached to appellate brief which are not part of the record
• appellate court is not authorized to consider documents attached to appellate brief that are not part of the record
• appellate court is not authorized to consider documents attached to appellate brief which are not part of the record
• appellate court is not authorized to consider documents attached to appellate brief which are not part of the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-07-14· cited 143×
• Varela v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-02-08· cited 95×
• Lackey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-09-15· cited 86×
• Lejeune v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-07-14· cited 68×
• United States v. Nelson Bunker Hunt and W. Herbert Hunt
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-12-23· cited 57×
• Kelly v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-10-10· cited 38×
• Gonzales v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-27· cited 24×
• Pittman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-06-17· cited 23×
• Smola v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-09· cited 17×
• Davy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2017-05-05· cited 17×
• Deal v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-24· cited 16×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-20· cited 15×
• Mullen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-01-15· cited 15×
• Ex parte Joyner
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2012-04-03· cited 12×
• Gipson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-03-07· cited 10×
• Grant v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-13· cited 9×
• Penix v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-04-20· cited 8×
• Anderson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2011-05-19· cited 6×
• Perkins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-10-22· cited 5×
• David Daniel Lauer v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-05-30