Booth v. Illinois
Citations
- 184 U.S. 425
- 22 S. Ct. 425
- 46 L. Ed. 623
- 1902 U.S. LEXIS 2282
Syllabus
<p>If, looking at all the circumstances which attend, or may ordinarily attend the pursuit of a particular calling, a State thinks that certain admitted evils cannot be successfully reached- unless that calling be actually prohibited, the courts cannot interfere unless, looking through mere forms and at the substance of the matter, they can say that the statute, enacted professedly to protect the public morals, has no real or substantial relation to that object, but is a clear, unmistakable infringement of rights secured by the fundamental lay. - ....</p> <p>It must be assumed with regard to section 130 of the Criminal Code of Illinois touching options to sell or buy grain or other property at a future time, that the legislature of the State was of .opinion that an effectual mode to suppress gambling grain contracts was to declare illegal all options to sell or buy at a future time; and this court cannot say that the means employed were not appropriate to the end sought to be attained and which it was competent for the State to accomplish.</p> <p>This court cannot adjudge that the legislature of Illinois transcended the limits of constitutional authority, when it enacted the statute in question.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding regulation barring commodities option contracts as not violative of Fourteenth Amendment “liberty”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harlan, Brewer, Peckham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.