N.D. Illinois· 1/25/1967
Booth v. General Dynamics Corporation
Citations
- 264 F. Supp. 465
- 10 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 663
- 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11003
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Only those . . . who reside within the corporate limits of the Sanitary District have standing to challenge the tax since only those taxpayers have tax liability to support district operations”
- action against sheriff for deprivation of claimant’s personal property in custody of sheriff
- action against sheriff for deprivation of claimant's personal property in custody of sheriff
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Will
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSecond Circuit· 1968-03-08· cited 609×
- Esplin v. HirschiTenth Circuit· 1968-09-30· cited 393×
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaS.D. New York· 1968-01-22· cited 172×
- 2 Fair empl.prac.cas. 356, 2 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,166 Pete Gomez v. Florida State Employment ServiceFifth Circuit· 1969-10-09· cited 148×
- Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc.N.D. California· 1967-08-17· cited 114×
- State of Illinois v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1969-04-25· cited 89×
- Leib v. 20th Century Corp.M.D. Pennsylvania· 1974-01-15· cited 67×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinS.D. New York· 1971-04-07· cited 55×
- Rexroad, Inc. v. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 66Nebraska Supreme Court· 1986-05-02· cited 44×
- Epstein v. WeissE.D. Louisiana· 1970-02-12· cited 40×
- Contract Buyers League v. F & F InvestmentN.D. Illinois· 1969-03-28· cited 34×
- Hornbeak v. HammM.D. Alabama· 1968-04-10· cited 27×
- Biechele v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.N.D. Ohio· 1969-06-19· cited 25×
- Collins v. BoltonN.D. Illinois· 1968-06-27· cited 13×
- Lesch v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad CompanyN.D. Illinois· 1968-02-15· cited 13×
- Alabama Optometric Ass'n v. Alabama State Board of HealthM.D. Alabama· 1974-07-26· cited 11×
- Unnamed caseTenth Circuit· 1969-03-24· cited 7×
- Elmhurst Stamping & Manufacturing Co. v. Amax Plating, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-12-11· cited 6×
- Gallano v. RunningNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-02-03· cited 5×
- Snyder v. EpsteinE.D. Wisconsin· 1968-10-22· cited 3×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court· 1923-06-11· cited 1,546×
- Doremus v. Board of Ed. of HawthorneSupreme Court· 1952-03-31· cited 512×
- Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court· 1915-11-06· cited 235×
- Droste v. KernerIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-03-24· cited 142×
- Fuller v. VolkThird Circuit· 1965-09-30· cited 92×
- Gray v. MorganSeventh Circuit· 1966-12-22· cited 55×
- Scott v. FrazierSupreme Court· 1920-06-01· cited 47×
- Russell v. StansellSupreme Court· 1882-03-13· cited 42×
- Ream v. HandleySeventh Circuit· 1966-04-20· cited 39×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinS.D. New York· 1966-09-27· cited 24×
- Owensboro Waterworks Co. v. OwensboroSupreme Court· 1906-01-02· cited 23×
- Walter Otto, a Taxpayer of the City of Dayton, Ohio v. Hon. Frank R. Somers, Mayor of the City of DaytonSixth Circuit· 1964-06-05· cited 19×
- Lawrence P. Hickey, George D. Sullivan, Jr., Burton H. Young and Thomas R. Benz v. Illinois Central Railroad, an Illinois CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1960-06-23· cited 10×
- Booth v. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1967-01-24· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.