· 11/23/2009
Boose v. TRI-COUNTY METRO. TRANSP. DIST. OF OREGON
Citations
- 587 F.3d 997
- 22 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1027
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25609
- 2009 WL 4020731
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding 4 || that a paratransit provider was not required to accommodate a disabled plaintiff's request to 5 || modify the paratransit policy by providing her with the transit vehicle of her choice, noting the 6 | Secretary of Transportation is in control of the overall framework
- “We will not, under the guise of deference, engage in an end-run around notice-and-comment rulemaking.”
- “Because the ADA was modeled on section 504 of the 24 Rehabilitation Act, courts have applied the same analysis to claims 25 brought under both statutes.”
- “Because the ADA was modeled 26 on section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, courts have applied the same 27 analysis to claims brought under both statutes.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Scannlain, Smith, Whyte
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.