Skip to main content
· 11/23/2009

Boose v. TRI-COUNTY METRO. TRANSP. DIST. OF OREGON

Citations

  • 587 F.3d 997
  • 22 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1027
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25609
  • 2009 WL 4020731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding 4 || that a paratransit provider was not required to accommodate a disabled plaintiff's request to 5 || modify the paratransit policy by providing her with the transit vehicle of her choice, noting the 6 | Secretary of Transportation is in control of the overall framework
  • “We will not, under the guise of deference, engage in an end-run around notice-and-comment rulemaking.”
  • “Because the ADA was modeled on section 504 of the 24 Rehabilitation Act, courts have applied the same analysis to claims 25 brought under both statutes.”
  • “Because the ADA was modeled 26 on section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, courts have applied the same 27 analysis to claims brought under both statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Smith, Whyte

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.