Boone v. Total Renal Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that “[c]ourts have differed in their characterization of the O’Loughlin court’s holding” and concluding that O’Loughlin stands for the proposition that the FCRA does “not cover pregnancy discrimination”
• “Title VII, as amended by the PDA, provides a cause of action for pregnancy discrimination and thus is broader in its protections than the FCRA.”
• “Title VII, as amended by the PDA, - 12 - provides a cause of action for pregnancy discrimination and thus is broader in its protections than the FCRA.”
• “On its face, the FCRA does not cover pregnancy.”
• “On its face, the FCRA does not cover pregnancy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).