Boone v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing restitution order in part because the amount of medical costs was supported only by the victim’s testimony and was not corroborated with billing records
• “It is axiomatic for purposes of determining the amount of restitution ... that the victim’s testimony must be corroborated with billing records.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Christina Prinz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-20· cited 2×
• MICHAEL LOVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-02-02
• Damon Christopher Depew v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-01-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schuette v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-06-20· cited 32×
• State v. Schuette
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-28· cited 6×
• M.J.T. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-12· cited 3×
• Crowley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-27· cited 2×