Skip to main content
· 3/1/1988

Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San Jose

Citations

  • 841 F.2d 886
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal based on Noerr-Pennington doctrine despite allegations that the redevelopment law was illegally used to redevelop non-blighted area
  • affirming dismissal of claims pursuant to Noerr-Pennington where plaintiff failed to allege facts to support sham exception and claims were otherwise barred by doctrine
  • affirming dismissal based on Noerr-Pennington doctrine despite allegations that the redevelopment law was illegally used to redevelop non-blighted area
  • discussing private meetings between individuals and city officials as within the doctrine
  • immunizing petitioning of city council to approve a zoning plan that harmed plaintiffs; council’s review held legislative based on broad discretion to approve or deny new projects whenever deemed “‘necessary or desirable’ to carry out the ends of redevelopment”
  • immunizing petitioning of city council to approve a zoning plan that harmed plaintiffs; council’s review held legislative based on broad discretion to approve or deny new projects whenever deemed “‘necessary or desirable’ to carry out the ends of redevelopment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.