Boone v. Goldin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even reassignment to a less appealing position is not an “adverse employment action” unless it has “some significant detrimental effect” on the plaintiff
• holding that reassignment was not an adverse action even though the plaintiff asserted that the new position was more stressful and had poor working conditions
• holding that reassignment can only support a Title VII claim if the reassignment had \significant detrimental effect\
• holding that reassignment can only qualify as an adverse employment action if it had some “significant detrimental effect” on the plaintiff
• holding that while reassignment to a position that required employee to work in a wind tunnel created “modest stress” not present in employee’s previous laboratory position, the reassignment did not constitute an adverse employment action
• stating that a significant change in working conditions and a decreased opportunity for future promotions are appropriate factors for consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).