Skip to main content
· 12/6/2002

Boomtown Belle Casino v. Bazor

Citations

  • 313 F.3d 300
  • 2003 A.M.C. 15
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24653
  • 2002 WL 31557353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an adjoining area was not a covered situs during its construction because the location “had yet to be used for a maritime purpose”
  • holding that floating casino was not a covered situs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Clement, Hudspeth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.