Booker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “newly discovered evidence” cannot be a “new interpretation of facts that were known and considered at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stephen Todd Booker v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Dept. Of Corrections, State of Florida
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-08-09· cited 43×
• Booker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-05· cited 35×
• Martin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-08-28· cited 31×
• Freeman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 22×
• Booker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-11-17· cited 20×
• Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections v. Booker
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-18· cited 15×
• Booker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-01-05· cited 14×
• Elledge v. Graham
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-04-14· cited 12×
• Ashley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-27· cited 6×
• Harold Lee Harvey, Jr. v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2026-06-18

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Booker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-03-19· cited 75×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-25· cited 55×