· 7/17/1996
Booker v. Singletary
Citations
- 90 F.3d 440
- 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 983
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that relief from “judgment under Rule 60(b)(6) is an extraordinary remedy”
- “Something more than a ‘mere’ change in the law is necessary to provide the grounds for Rule 60(b)(6) relief.” (quotation marks and alterations omitted)
- “Something more than a ‘mere’ change in the law is necessary to provide the grounds for Rule 60(b)(6) relief.” (quotation marks and alterations omitted)
- finding prejudice under Brecht because “we were unable to speculate as to the effect of the disregarded ‘substantial [mitigating] evidence would have had on the sentencing body’”
- “The vacation of a judgment under Rule 60(b)(6) is an extraordinary remedy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Hatchett, Dubina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.