Skip to main content
· 7/17/1996

Booker v. Singletary

Citations

  • 90 F.3d 440
  • 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 983
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that relief from “judgment under Rule 60(b)(6) is an extraordinary remedy”
  • “Something more than a ‘mere’ change in the law is necessary to provide the grounds for Rule 60(b)(6) relief.” (quotation marks and alterations omitted)
  • “Something more than a ‘mere’ change in the law is necessary to provide the grounds for Rule 60(b)(6) relief.” (quotation marks and alterations omitted)
  • finding prejudice under Brecht because “we were unable to speculate as to the effect of the disregarded ‘substantial [mitigating] evidence would have had on the sentencing body’”
  • “The vacation of a judgment under Rule 60(b)(6) is an extraordinary remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Hatchett, Dubina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.