Booker v. Older Americans Council of Middle Georgia, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Bringing the trial court’s attention to an improper argument after the argument was made, in the course of a bench conference, did not suffice to preserve an error for appeal.
• finding as improper the defense counsel’s remarks in closing argument that “this case is about greed and greed on top of greed . . . everybody sitting at the table with [the plaintiff] has a financial interest in the outcome of this case”
• “[Appellant] made no objection to the trial court’s instruction as given and did not move for a mistrial; he acquiesced to the trial court’s ruling. Thus, this allegation of error presents nothing for review.”
• “[Appellant] made no objection to the trial court’s instruction as given and did not move for a mistrial; he acquiesced to the trial court’s ruling. Thus, this allegation of error presents nothing for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).